21. Ott MA mais aussi al., The fresh exchange-from anywhere between hormones contraceptives and you will condoms one of teens, Viewpoints for the Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
22. Wilson EK and you can Koo Horsepower, Associations ranging from lower-income ladies relationships services in addition to their birth prevention use, Views towards Sexual and you can Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC et al., Family relations and you can friend closeness so you’re able to adolescent sexual couples inside the relationship to condom play with, Journal regarding Teenage Fitness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA mais aussi al., New developmental organization from relationships quality, hormone contraceptive choice and you will condom low-use certainly teenage women, Record of Teenage Health, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational relationship and threats to relationships maintenance specifications: influences to the condom play with, Record regarding American School Health, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
27. Manning WD et al., Young mature dating relationship as well as the handling of sexual risk, Society Lookup and you can Plan Opinion, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty-eight. Manlove J ainsi que al., Adolescent moms and dads from inside the promote care and attention: risk things and you can outcomes for youngsters as well as their children, Search Brief, Washington, DC: Youngster Manner, 2011.
31. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual risk practices for the having more mature sex people: an examination of black colored adolescent ladies, Sexually Sent Infection 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD et al., Condom fool around with while the a function of amount of time in the new and you will founded adolescent sexual relationship, Western Record off Societal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Exposure and you can protective affairs for the change in order to an initial sexual experience of an older lover, Log away from Teenage Fitness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Birth control have fun with models across teens’ sexual relationships, papers exhibited in the annual conference of your Inhabitants Connection out of The usa, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and you may Longmore MA, Hooking up: the relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex, Log away from Teenage Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and you may Furstenberg FF, Jr, The consequences out of multi-partnered fertility to possess parental tips and you will matchmaking, papers presented on yearly appointment of one’s Relationship to possess Social Rules Study and you can Management, Washington, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Trying to find a mate? New marital and cohabitation records out-of unwed mothers, in: Wu LL and you can Wolfe B, eds., Off Wedlock: Reasons and you may Effects off Nonmarital Fertility, Ny: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Emerging Responses 2007: Browse Results to your Software to minimize Adolescent Pregnancy and you may Sexually Carried Disease, Arizona, DC: National Promotion to stop Teen and you may Unplanned Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The fresh new feeling out of software to boost birth control fool around with among mature women: a review of experimental and you can quasi-experimental education, Viewpoints toward Sexual and Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove is program city director and you can senior search researcher, Kate Welti is lookup scientist, Elizabeth Wildsmith was senior lookup scientist and you may Megan Barry is research analyst, the at Youngster Trend, Bethesda, MD.
Record
In the first research, that used a community-city test from adolescents in Ohio, Manning and associates nine labeled relationships properties towards the one to directory away from positive services (eg close worry about-disclosure, passionate love and you will relationship salience) and another list off negative characteristics (eg dispute and you can nonexclusivity). They found that high scores to your often list were from the smaller condom surface. Descriptive analyses in addition to recommended you to a combination of high confident and you can highest negative scores are for the less condom texture.
For the for each and every bullet, professionals was expected “Once the big date off history interviews, have you been in the a dating matchmaking the place you believe of your self as part of a couple?” We experienced respondents to stay an online dating matchmaking when they responded sure incase the brand new spouse is a current matchmaking lover, instead of a wife, cohabiting partner or former spouse. Same-sex dating dating and people where the respondent had in earlier times cohabited to the lover had been omitted. Complete, cuatro,013 participants said a recently available matchmaking matchmaking during 2002–2005. Of your own remaining respondents, 553 were not about try from inside the series of interest, 1,876 was indeed cohabiting otherwise partnered, and you may 2,542 had no latest relationship relationships. Respondents inside our attempt was old 18–26.
Dating connection is considering a couple of measures. The initial is a great 0–10 level where participants rated the alternative which they and you will the partner would be to one another when you look at the six months. A rating regarding no conveyed not a way; a ten indicated 100% opportunities. I classified which probability as low (less than six), typical (6–9) otherwise large (10). For the next way of measuring connection, i integrated a variable to possess if the couple got talked about matrimony or cohabitation; solutions was basically classified since the chatted about none, chatted about cohabitation or talked about relationships. (Participants whom reported which have chatted about one another cohabitation and you can wedding was basically included in the relationship group.)
Heterogeneous birth-control effects within longer term relationships may also help define all the way down birth control feel into the offered teenage matchmaking, even with higher odds of actually-accessibility contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Earlier in the day studies have translated this selecting by the positing that people are willing to sometimes go without birth-control include in much more serious relationships; thirty-two, 34 yet not, the overall performance recommend that faster birth control have fun with tends to be focused during the long-er label relationships characterized by large argument and lower partnership.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Fl and you can Pleck JH, This new figure of young men’s condom play with throughout and across the matchmaking, Family relations Think Viewpoints, 1994, 26(6):246–251.